Politics
Up

 

Print Friendly and PDF     Site Search and Site Map   

 

Table of Contents

PREVIOUS        NEXT

Definitions

Geographic Aspects

Types of Governments

Political Conflict

 

 

GEOG 1303 MARGIN NOTES

 

Getting Organized: Politics and Geography

 

Humans have been organizing and structuring themselves from the beginning. Geographers are interested in such structuring because it is an expression of the human organization of space and is closely related to other spatial evidences of culture, such as religion, language and ethnicity.

Political Geography is the study of the organization and distribution of political phenomena, including their impact on other spatial components of society and culture.

Political geography is concerned with the study of both the spatially uneven outcomes of political processes and the ways in which political processes are themselves affected by spatial structures. Conventionally political geography adopts a three-scale structure for the purposes of analysis with the study of the state at the center, above this is the study of international relations (or geopolitics), and below it is the study of localities. The primary concerns of the sub-discipline can be summarized as the inter-relationships between people, state and territory.

Political geography has extended the scope of traditional political science approaches by acknowledging that the exercise of power is not restricted to states and bureaucracies, but is part of everyday life. This has resulted in the concerns of political geography increasingly overlapping with those of other human geography sub-disciplines such as economic geography, and, particularly, with those of social and cultural geography in relation to the study of the politics of place. Modern political geography often considers:

how and why states are organized into regional groupings, both formally (e.g. the European Union) and informally (e.g. the Third World)

the relationship between states and former colonies, and how these are propagated over time, for example through neo-colonialism

the relationship between a government and its people

the relationships between states including international trades and treaties

the functions, demarcations and policing of boundaries

how imagined geographies have political implications

the influence of political power on geographical space

how communications (telephone, radio, TV, Internet, social networks) have political implications

the study of election results (electoral geography)

 

 

 

 

 

 

GEOG 1303 MARGIN NOTES

 

Definitions

 

For now we will define state on the international level as an independent political unit occupying a defined, permanently populated territory and having full sovereign control over its internal and foreign affairs.

In contrast a nation is a cultural concept defining a group of people with a common culture occupying a particular territory, bound together by a strong sense of unity arising from shared beliefs and customs.

The composite term nation-state properly refers to a state whose territorial extent coincides with that occupied by a distinct nation or people. There are very few 100% nation-states.

        Iceland

        Denmark

        Poland

        Japan

 

A multi-nation state (or multinational state) is one that contains more than one nation … the opposite of a nation-state.

        Canada

        Cyprus

 

A part-nation state occurs when a nation is dispersed across and is predominant in two or more states.

        Arab Nation

 

A stateless nation is a people without state … The world is populated by more than 1,600 stateless nations, most of which are in one way or another engaged in national movements. The classic instance of a stateless nation has been the Jewish people who for long centuries suffered for lack of a homeland until 1948. Other examples include

many indigenous peoples that have been maneuvered into minority status in their home countries by colonial powers

the gypsy / Roma people of Europe

the Palestinians

the Basques

the Kurds: numbering an estimated 20 million, are commonly seen as the world's largest nation without a state.

About 10 million are in Turkey, 4 million in Iraq, 5 million in Iran and a million in Syria.

There may be another million in the former Soviet Union.

About 400,000 of the 1.8 million guest workers from Turkey living in Germany are of Kurdish origin.

 

 

The Modern State

The earliest forms of the state emerged once it became possible to centralize power in a durable way. Agriculture and writing are almost everywhere associated with this process. Agriculture allowed for the production and storing of a surplus, which in turn allowed and encouraged the emergence of a class of people who controlled and protected the agricultural stores and thus did not have to spend most of their time providing for their own subsistence. Writing made possible the centralization of vital information.

The story of the development of the specifically modern state begins with the dissolution of the western Roman Empire. This led to the fragmentation of the imperial state into the hands of private and decentralized lords whose political, judicial and military roles corresponded to the organization of economic production. In place of the fragmented system of feudal rule, with its often indistinct territorial claims, large unitary states with extensive control over definite territories emerged. This process gave rise to the highly centralized and increasingly bureaucratic forms of absolute monarchical rule of the 17th and 18th centuries, when the principal features of the contemporary state system took form, including the introduction of a standing army, a central taxation system, diplomatic relations with permanent embassies, and the development of state economic policy — mercantilism.

The Peace of Westphalia ended both the Thirty Years' War in Germany and the Eighty Years' War between Spain and the Netherlands. The treaties involved the Holy Roman Emperor, the Kingdoms of Spain, France and Sweden, the Dutch Republic and their respective allies among the princes of the Holy Roman Empire. The Peace of Westphalia resulted from the first modern diplomatic congress and initiated a new order in central Europe based on the concept of state sovereignty. Sovereignty is the exclusive right to control a government, a country and a people.

The now universal idea of the modern state was developed by European political philosophers in the 18th century which advanced the concept that people owe their allegiance to aCOLONIAL EMPIRES - 1914 state and the people it represents rather than its leader or king. The new concept coincided in France with the French Revolution and spread throughout Western Europe to England, Spain and Germany.

This idea of state was passed on to much of Africa, Asia and the Americas during the European expansion in the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries. Indigenous people had their own organized used of space, but the borders were drawn for the convenience of the Europeans who ignored the existing cultures and political structure. As many of these former colonies have gained political independence, they have maintained the idea of state and the borders established by the Europeans.

The idea of separate statehood grew slowly at first. In 1800 there were 35 countries in the world. By 1939 there were 70 countries. After World War II, the end of the colonial era brought a rapid increase in the number of sovereign states. At present there are over 200 sovereign states.

Political Resources on the Net

The Law of the Sea

Are we really prisoners of geography?

 

RETURN TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

GEOG 1303 MARGIN NOTES

 

Geographic Aspects

 

Size, shape and location have great effect on the power and stability of states. Keep in mind that some states are bigger than others but resources are not evenly distributed.

 

 

Size

In general, the larger the state, the better the chance that there will be enough resources to support the state, but Canada, Russia and Australia are large states with relatively small areas capable of supporting agriculture.

Size can also hinder the effective control of a state’s people and/or resources.

 

 

Shape

Like size, shape can affect the well-being of a state by fostering or hindering effective organization.

OUTLINE MAP OF CAMBODIA

 

Compact states: states that are roughly circular in shape … the distance from the center to any point on the boundary exhibits little variation … Cambodia, Poland, Zimbabwe and Uruguay are examples.

 

OUTLINE MAP OF THAILAND

 

Prorupt states: nearly compact but possess one or sometimes two narrow extensions of territory. Proruption may simply reflect peninsular elongations of land area, such as with Thailand. In other instances, the extensions have an economic or strategic significance - securing access to resources or water routes. Namibia strip was designed by the Germans to give access to the Zambezi River.

 

 

Elongated states: a state whose territory is decidedly long and narrow; its length is at least six times greater than its average width. the least efficient shape administratively is represented by countries like Vietnam, Norway or Chile which are long and narrow. Parts of the country far from the capital are likely to be isolated. These countries are likely to encompass more diversity of climate, resources and people.

 

OUTLINE MAP OF MALAYSIA

Fragmented states: countries composed entirely of islands (Philippines, Indonesia), countries partly on islands and partly on mainland (Italy and Malaysia) and countries that are chiefly on the mainland, but whose territory is separated by another state (US). Pakistan was once a fragmented country until 1971 when the eastern part broke away and became Bangladesh.

 

 

OUTLINE MAP OF SOUTH AFRICA

Perforated states: state whose territory completely surrounds the territory of another state so that it has a hole in it. South Africa (Lesotho) and Italy (San Marino and Vatican City) are examples.

 

 

Boundaries

The whole world, even Antarctica, is divided up and claimed by countries.

Natural boundaries: those based on recognizable physical features, such as mountains, rivers or lakes. Even though these natural boundaries seem like a good idea, in practice there are problems.

Artificial boundaries: alternative to natural boundaries … geometric boundaries

Antecedent boundary: one drawn before an area is well populated and prior to the cultural landscape features, such as the 49th parallel separating the US and Canada.

Subsequent boundaries: boundaries drawn after the development of the cultural landscape … There are two types of subsequent boundaries.

Consequent boundary: which is a border drawn to accommodate existing cultural differences … Northern Ireland and Ireland

Superimposed boundary: a boundary imposed on an area by a conquering or colonizing power that is unconcerned about pre-existing cultural patterns … Africa, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan

Relict boundary: a former boundary line that once had meaning but no longer functions as such, usually marked by landscape features (forts, castles). The abandoned castles dotting the frontier zone between Wales and England constitute a relict boundary.

 

 

Boundary Disputes

tHE bERLIN wALLBoundary disputes are constant sources of problems in the world. Since World War II almost one-half of the countries in the world have been involved in some kind of boundary dispute.

There are four general types of boundary disputes.

Positional disputes occur when states disagree about the interpretation of documents that define a boundary. The boundary between Argentina and Chile was to follow the highest peaks and the watersheds between the east and west flowing rivers. These two things do not always coincide. Argentina and Chile nearly went to war in the late 70’s over this when oil and gas deposits were discovered in the disputed area.

Territorial disputes arise when a superimposed boundary divides an ethnically homogeneous population. Conflicts can arise when one of the states wants to annex part of another state to reunite a group of people. Hitler used this as an excuse to invade Czechoslovakia and Poland to reunite pockets of German minorities residing in these states. Somalia has had border clashes with Ethiopia over Somalis living in that country. Kashmir, a disputed area between India and Pakistan have caused two wars so far.

Resource disputes arise when neighboring states want access to resources from another state. The US has had a dispute with Mexico over water rights from the Colorado River and with Canada over fishing grounds. The Gulf War was also related to this. Iraq helped justify its invasion of Kuwait because of a large oil reserve that mostly lies in Iraq that Kuwait pumps oil from.

Functional disputes arise when neighboring states disagree over policies applied over a boundary. US-Mexican border disputes over drugs and immigration.

 

Map Showing Land-Locked States

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RETURN TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

GEOG 1303 MARGIN NOTES

 

Types of Governments

 

Classification of governments can be based on several different variables.

 

Economy: Who provides the goods and services that are bought, sold and used?

Capitalism

(Russia)

Socialism

(Norway)

Communism

(Cuba)

In a capitalist or free-market economy, people own their own businesses and property and must buy services for private use, such as healthcare.

Socialist governments own many of the larger industries and provide education, health and welfare services while allowing citizens some economic choices.

In a communist country, the government owns all businesses and farms and provides its people's healthcare, education and welfare.

 

Politics: How is the government run?

Dictatorship

(Syria)

Totalitarian

(China)

Theocracy

(Iran)

Monarchy

(Jordan)

Parliamentary

(Israel)

Republic

(USA)

Anarchy

(Afghanistan?)

Rule by a single unelected leader who may use force to keep control. In a military dictatorship, the army is in control. Usually, there is little or no attention to public opinion or individual rights.

Rule by a single political party.
People forced to do what government tells them and may be prevented from leaving the country.

A form of government where rulers claim to be ruling on behalf of a set of religious ideas or as direct agents of a deity.

A monarchy has a king or queen who sometimes has absolute power. Power is passed through the family.

A parliamentary government is led by representatives of the people. Each is chosen as a member of a political party and remains in power as long as the party does.

A republic is led by representatives of the voters. Each is individually chosen for a set period of time.

Anarchy is a situation where there is no government.
This can happen after a civil war in a country, when a government was destroyed and rival groups fight to take its place.

 

                                            Authority: Who picks the government?

Revolutionary

(US, France, USSR etc)

Totalitarian

(North Korea)

Oligarchy/Plutocracy

(Venezuela)

Democracy

(India)

North Korea's Kim Jong Un

The existing government is overthrown by a completely new group. The new group can be very small (such as the military) or very large (as in a popular revolution). After a period of time, the revolutionary government evolves into one of the other types of government (unless there is another coup or uprising).

Totalitarian governments are ruled by a single political party.
Votes for alternative candidates and parties are simply not allowed. Citizens are expected to vote, but only for the government's chosen candidates.

A form of government which consists of rule by an elite group who rule in their own interests, especially the accumulation of wealth and privilege. Only certain members of society have a valid voice in the govt. This can reflect (but is not limited to) economic interests (plutocracy), a particular religion (theocracy) or familial rule (monarchy).

In a democracy, the government is elected by the people. Everyone who is eligible to vote - which is a majority of the population - has a chance to have their say in who runs the country.

 

 

Political Ideology

Leadership Types

The terms left and right create essentially an economic line, shown by the horizontal line above. That's fine as far as it goes. Leaders committed to a totally controlled economy go on the hard left. Socialists occupy a less extreme leftist position. Extreme free-market advocates, who advocate no control over the economy belong on the far right.

That deals with economics, but the social dimension is also important in politics. That's the one that the mere left-right scale doesn't adequately address. So the people at Political Compass added a vertical social line that ranges in positions from extreme authoritarian (the state is more important than the individual) to extreme libertarian (the individual is more important than the state). Both an economic dimension and a social dimension are important factors for a proper political analysis. The chart makes clear that, despite popular perceptions, the opposite of fascism is not communism but anarchism (ie liberal socialism), and that the opposite of communism ( i.e. an entirely state-planned economy) is neo-liberalism (i.e. extreme unregulated economy)

In the Authoritarian Right quadrant (the upper right) we find leaders such as George Bush. US neo-conservatives, with their commitment to high military spending and the global assertion of national values, tend to be more authoritarian than hard right. The lower right (Libertarian Right) quadrant is blank but it's safe to say that this is the domain of the true libertarian, those who value the individual more than the state and who advocate an unregulated economy. Unfortunately, there are not many (if any) leaders who hold those views.

The upper-left (Authoritarian Left) quadrant is where we find those leaders who - either moderately or extremely - advocate the importance of state control of the individual and the economy ... the opposite of the lower right quadrant.

Leaders in the Libertarian Left (lower left) quadrant come along infrequently - although more so than those in the lower right - believing as they do in the importance of the state vis--vis the economy but not the individual.

 

Remember: Nearly every country in the world is based on a system that combines 2 or more of the types above. For example, the US is not a true capitalist society since the government actually provides some services for its citizens. Additionally, one person's opinion of the type of government may differ from another's. Many argue that the US is actually a plutocracy rather than a democracy.

 

World Political Systems

 

Additional Sources of Information

CBBC: Types of Government

How Canadians Govern Themselves

Political Systems Explained

Bureau of African Affairs (AF)

Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs (EAP)

Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs (EUR)

Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs (NEA)

Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs (SCA)

Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs (WHA)

Bureau of International Organization Affairs (IO)

The CIA Factbook

CIA's The World Factbook: Field Listing of Government Type

Different Types of Governments

Janes is a defense and open-source intelligence firm.

 

 

Freedom in the World 2022

Just one in five people now live in countries designated as “free,” down from nearly one in two in 2005, a new report from Freedom House found.

RETURN TO TOP

 

 

 

 

 

 

GEOG 1303 MARGIN NOTES

 

Political Conflict

 

At any moment in time, a state can be characterized by forces that promote unity and by forces that disrupt unity.

 

State Cohesiveness

Centripetal Forces

 

Forces form within a state that unite it … forces that keep a country together.

Memory Hint:           centripetal = pull together

Ultra Orthodox Jews in Jerusalem, 2012One of the most powerful centripetal forces is nationalism which is an identification with the state and the acceptance of its national goals. Nationalism is based on the concept of allegiance to a single country, its ideals and way of life. Most countries have more than one culture and in multi-cultural societies, nationalism helps to integrate groups into a unified population. This kind of consensus nationalism has emerged in the US.

Unifying institutions like schools are expected to instill a society’s goals, values and traditions, and to teach a common language.

Organization and administration is a binding force when there is public confidence in the effective organization of the state.

Good transportation and communication networks foster political integration by promoting interaction between areas and by joining them economically and socially.

Other Examples:    a strong common culture, religion, language, history, a popular national hero, a common outside threat, colonialism, an historical enemy

 

Centrifugal ForcesConflict in Syria, 2012

 

Forces from within a state that tend to divide it … causes of conflicts within a state.

Memory Hint:    centrifugal = go apart

Iranian Pro-Democracy Protesters, 2012Nationalism is one of the most powerful centripetal forces but it also can be a disruptive centrifugal force. The idea of the nation-state is that states are formed around nations of people. It is a small step from that to the idea that every nation has the right to its own state or territory.

A dissident minority that has total or partial secession of the state as its primary goal is said to be guided by separatism or autonomous nationalism. Canada, for example, has a powerful secessionist movement in French-speaking Quebec … a vote in 1995 just barely lost 51 to 49%.

Separatist movements are expressions of regionalism, which is minority group identification with a region rather than a state.

Other Examples:    religion, language, ethnicity, ideology

 

Nigeria's Boko Haram Militants (PDF)

A Simple and Useful Guide to Understanding the Conflict in Iraq (1:42)

Amnesty International State of the World 2015-2016

 

 

BalkanizationGIVE THEM FREEDOM

 

The fragmentation of a region into smaller, often hostile, political units … usually results in a new independent state. The term comes from the Balkan Peninsula of Europe, a region that has balkanized many times and is still undergoing balkanization.

Examples:        Yugoslavia, USSR, East Timor

Unsuccessful Attempts:    Kashmir, Sri Lanka, Kurdistan

 

 

Devolution

 

The process by which regions within a state demand and gain political strength and growing autonomy at the expense of the central government. Devolutionary pressures result in increased autonomy for a region. (If strong enough, these devolutionary pressures may result in balkanization.)

Examples:    US Indian Reservations, Scotland, Chechnya in Russia (changing), Quebec

 

 

Irredentism

 

A policy of cultural extension and potential political expansion aimed at a national group living in a neighboring country. For example, when India mistreated Muslims living in the states of Jammu and Kashmir, the Muslim government of neighboring Pakistan threatened and ultimately went to war. Irredentism is often a cause of cultural conflicts as countries protect members of their cultural group living in neighboring countries.

Examples:        the Marsh Shiites, Armenians in Azerbaijan, Muslims in Kashmir, Serbs in Bosnia, Somalis in Ethiopia and Kenya, Afghanis in Pakistan

Solutions:          relocate borders, resettle population, devolution / autonomy

 

Ugeria: Heterogeneous Independence

 

RETURN TO TOP

 


FOOTER LOGO

Copyright 1996 Amy S Glenn
Last updated:   11/01/2023 1900

Creative Commons License